Remote Aquifer Response to the 18 November 1755 Cape Anne Earthquake
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Other| May 01, 2001 Remote Aquifer Response to the 18 November 1755 Cape Anne Earthquake Robert M. Thorson Robert M. Thorson Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Connecticut Unit 2045, 354 Mansfield Road Storrs, CT 06269-2045 Telephone +1-860-486-1396 Fax +1-860-486-1383 thorson@sp.uconn.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Seismological Research Letters (2001) 72 (3): 401–403. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.3.401 Article history first online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Robert M. Thorson; Remote Aquifer Response to the 18 November 1755 Cape Anne Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 2001;; 72 (3): 401–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.3.401 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search The historic earthquake of 18 November 1755, the largest in the New England catalog, was felt widely throughout the American colonies and adjacent Canada (Street and Lacroix, 1979; Ebel and Kafka, 1991). Moderate damage—toppled stone walls, broken chimneys, cracks and liquefaction—was largely restricted to the lowland north of Boston near Cape Anne, with an inferred epicenter on the continental shelf to the east (42.70°N, 70.30°W. The earthquake has been assigned an epicentral Modified Mercalli intensity of 8 and a magnitude of 6.0. Abrupt, long-term changes in the flow rate and chemistry of water wells from five Connecticut... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.067 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".