MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314351469 · doi:10.7754/clin.lab.2012.120525

An Iron Deficient Patient with Opposite Iron Profiles within Five Days

2013· letter· en· W2314351469 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Tarr, Yu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Laboratory · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health NetworkDr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 77-year-old woman with a long term iron deficiency anemia had routine blood work done because the patient was taking ferrous gluconate 300 mg/day irregularly. She had a subtotal colectomy (including cecum and a portion of terminal ileum) for Crohn’s disease 15 years ago. The complete blood count indicated as microcytic, hypochromic anemia with erythrocytes 3.45 x 10/L (reference interval (RI): 4 10 x 10/L), hemoglobin 87 g/L (RI: 115 155 g/L), hematocrit 26.7% (RI: 35 45%), mean corpuscular volume 77.3 fL (RI: 82 100 fL), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin 25.2 pg (RI: 27 34 pg). Due to the significant increase in serum iron (83 μmol/L) and transferrin saturation (93.3%), she was advised to stop taking her iron supplement. Considering the inconsistent laboratory results between iron profile, blood count and patient’s history, five days later the patient’s iron profile was repeated and results were completely opposite (Table 1). Therefore, the question of a possible laboratory error was raised. Laboratory investigation excluded sample labeling errors and analytical errors. Detailed patient inquiry revealed that on day 1, the patient took one iron dose (300 mg) with lunch and had blood drawn 4 hours later, whereas she was fasting and had not taken her iron medication for 2 days on day 6. A low serum ferritin value is the most sensitive and reliable serum indicator for iron deficiency [1], as it correctly reflected this patient’s iron depletion status on day 1. The patient’s iron supplementation should not be discontinued based on her low ferritin levels without repeating the iron profile. The slightly elevated ferritin on day 6 was due to inflammation from a sore throat; it dropped to 42 μg/L five weeks later. Because ferritin is an acute phase reactant, a normal or even elevated serum ferritin level cannot be used to exclude iron deficiency if a hepatic, malignant, or inflammatory condition is present [2]. Serum iron fluctuates with food and medication. It is often unreliable for the diagnosis of iron deficiency. Unsaturated iron-binding capacity, total iron binding capacity, and transferring saturation on day 1 were all misled by the erroneous high serum iron result due to supplementation only 4 hours prior to testing. For iron profile tests, patients should fast 8 12 hours and blood should be collected in the morning to avoid diurnal variation. In addition, iron containing supplements should be avoided for 24 hours prior to blood collection [3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical LaboratorySame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207