MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314362287 · doi:10.1061/40971(310)15

Analysis of Infinite Slopes with Spatially Random Shear Strength

2008· article· en· W2314362287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoCongress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsParametric statisticsLandslideGeotechnical engineeringShear strength (soil)Slope stabilityGeologyStandard deviationFailure mechanismMoment (physics)Shear (geology)Random fieldStructural engineeringMathematicsSoil waterEngineeringSoil scienceStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study investigates the role of spatially random soil on the stability of infinite slopes with application to landslides and other geohazards. The influence of the shear strength mean, standard deviation and spatial correlation length on the probability of failure is thoroughly investigated through parametric studies. The results show that the traditional "first order second moment" approach to this problem is inherently unconservative, due to its inability to allow the failure mechanism to "seek out" the critical depth below ground surface, which is frequently not at the base of the soil layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it