Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intensive therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation represent the standard of care in most patients whose Hodgkin disease has not been cured with conventional chemotherapy. With more prolonged follow-up of autografted patients, the problems with autologous stem cell transplantation are clear. In particular, recurrent disease and late transplant-related complications limit the effectiveness of this approach. A number of autologous stem cell transplantation studies have reported prognostic factors that will help identify patients at high risk for relapse. Several new approaches for decreasing recurrence rates are discussed, including novel immune strategies and re-evaluation of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Although the risk of secondary malignancy and other causes of late morbidity and mortality after autologous stem cell transplantation is relatively low, current studies contribute to understanding of the pathogenesis of these complications and may diminish their impact in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it