MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314404643 · doi:10.1097/wno.0b013e318270316b

Eyelid and Eye Movements Following Fourth to Third Nerve Anastomosis

2012· article· en· W2314404643 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen P. Lownie, Craig Pinkoski, Lulu L.C.D. Bursztyn, David A. Nicolle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReinnervationEpineurial repairAnastomosisBrainstemOculomotor nerveSurgeryAnatomySchwannomaSciatic nerveInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 34-year-old woman presented with brainstem compression from a large third nerve schwannoma although third nerve function was intact. At surgery, preservation of the proximal third nerve was not possible. Because of preexisting amblyopia of the contralateral eye, an attempt was made to surgically reinnervate the affected third nerve. The fourth nerve was divided at its entry into the tentorium and anastomosed to the distal stump of the third nerve. Partial recovery of third function occurred over several months and is still present 6 years later. Successful long-term reinnervation of the third nerve by direct anastomosis with the fourth nerve may be useful when third repair is not possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207