MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314445259 · doi:10.1177/0840470415626525

Health sector changes must reach further

2016· review· en· W2314445259 on OpenAlexaff
Wayne Overbo

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Northwest TerritoriesIndustry, Tourism and InvestmentInstitute for Circumpolar Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningHealth carePublic relationsHealth sectorOrganizational changeChange management (ITSM)BusinessPolitical scienceMedicineSociologyMarketingHealth servicesEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Change management is relevant for healthcare leaders at all levels. This article offers a literature review and pulls from the author's own experience to emphasize the importance of transformative, sustainable change. Leaders are reminded that change comes from within, draws from all levels of the organization, and must be pervasive throughout a project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.018
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207