MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314505601 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-289

Abstract 289: Associations between germline genotype and efficacy and safety outcomes in a phase III study of sunitinib (SU) and FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

2011· article· en· W2314505601 on OpenAlexaff
Alfredo Carrato, Feng Gao, Jodi Richmond, James A. Williams, Xun Lin, Derek J. Jonker, Yu Sun, Jhony A. De La Cruz‐Vargas, Jennifer Tursi, M.J. Lechuga, Eric Van Cutsem

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOLFIRISingle-nucleotide polymorphismInternal medicineGenotypeMedicineOncologyGenotypingColorectal cancerGastroenterologyCancerBiologyIrinotecanGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: SU is an oral, multitargeted inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, FLT3, CSF-1R and RET. In a phase III mCRC study, adding SU to FOLFIRI did not improve progression-free survival (PFS) vs. FOLFIRI/placebo. Potential correlations were investigated between germline genotype and safety/efficacy endpoints among patients (pts) in this trial. Methods: Blood sample donation for genotype analysis was optional. Selection of genes and polymorphisms was based on prior reported associations. Twenty-one single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 10 genes (VEGF-A, VEGFR-2, CYP1A1, ABCG2, ABCB1, ABCC2, MTHFR, UGT1A1, FLT1 and FLT3) were analyzed by TaqMan allelic discrimination assay or fragment analysis, using DNA isolated from peripheral blood samples. All 21 polymorphisms were analyzed for associations with efficacy (PFS; overall survival [OS]) and selected safety endpoints. Results were adjusted for multiple testing of SNPs in linkage disequilibrium. Results: Genotyping was performed in 139/768 pts (18%). Age and gender were similar between genotyped and non-genotyped pts, but the genotyped subset had fewer non-Caucasians (13% vs. 39%; Fisher's exact P<0.0001). Therefore, the statistical analysis reported here included Caucasians only. OS was superior in genotyped vs. non-genotyped pts (log rank P<0.0001). For the FOLFIRI/placebo arm only, the ABCC2 gene SNP rs717620 was associated with increased grade 3/4 diarrhea for those with the T allele (0/37 for C/C, 2/15 for C/T, 2/2 for T/T; Fisher's exact P=0.0003), and remained statistically significant after multiple testing adjustment. In the SU/FOLFIRI arm only, the common homozygous genotype A/A in the CYP1A1 gene at rs1048943 was associated with increased grade 3/4 neutropenia (39/59 for A/A, 1/6 for A/G, # of G/G = 0; Fisher's exact P=0.028), but lost significance after multiple testing adjustment. In the FOLFIRI/placebo arm only, a weak association was observed between poorer PFS and the common homozygous genotype T/T for the rs1045642 SNP (C3435T) in the ABCB1 gene (median [T/T] = 36 weeks [95% CI 24.9-40.6]; median [T/C] = 45 weeks [41.9-83.6]; median [C/C] = 55.1 weeks [31.8-55.1], HR [T/C vs. T/T] = 0.21 [95% CI 0.07-0.64]; HR [C/C vs. T/T] = 0.23 [95% CI 0.07-0.81]; log rank P=0.008; not significant after multiple testing adjustment). Conclusions: Presence of the T allele in the ABCC2 gene at rs717620 was associated with increased risk of grade 3/4 diarrhea in a small number of Caucasian pts receiving FOLFIRI/placebo. No significant associations were identified between genotype and safety/efficacy endpoints in pts who received SU/FOLFIRI. As OS was superior in genotyped vs. non-genotyped pts, correlative findings may not be extrapolated beyond the genotyped subset. Further analysis of baseline characteristics is underway in the genotyped group to investigate this difference. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 289. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-289

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207