MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314542341 · doi:10.1149/1.3229968

Pitting of Passivated Cadmium Monocrystals

2009· article· en· W2314542341 on OpenAlexaff
Desmond Tromans

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleationDissolutionPitting corrosionMaterials sciencePolarization (electrochemistry)CadmiumChlorideAqueous solutionMetallurgyCrystallographyChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A combination of aqueous thermodynamics, anodic polarization tests and scanning electron microcopy was used to study the pitting behavior of Cd monocrystals in a phosphate buffered (pH 11.2) solution of 0.1 M NaCl. Pitting occurred in the passive region where the most stable passive film was Cd (OH)2. The initial film thickness was estimated to be ~4 x 10-9 m. Pitting potentials were not reproducible, being variable within surfaces of the same orientation and between different orientations. Variability was attributed to structural defects in the passive film playing a major role in pit site nucleation. Early stages of pitting produced crystallographic facets consistent with (0001), and planes, the morphology becoming increasingly complex with pit growth. The pH decreased in the growing pit and increased the influence of chloride species on localized dissolution behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207