Self-Focusing by Ostwald Ripening: A Strategy for Layer-by-Layer Epitaxial Growth on Upconverting Nanocrystals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We demonstrate a novel epitaxial layer-by-layer growth on upconverting NaYF(4) nanocrystals (NCs) utilizing Ostwald ripening dynamics tunable both in thickness and composition. Injection of small sacrificial NCs (SNCs) as shell precursors into larger core NCs results in the rapid dissolution of the SNCs and their deposition onto the larger core NCs to yield core-shell structured NCs. Exploiting this NC size dependent dissolution/growth, the shell thickness can be controlled either by manipulating the number of SNCs injected or by successive injection of SNCs. In either of these approaches, the NCs self-focus from an initial bimodal distribution to a unimodal distribution (σ <5%) of core-shell NCs. The successive injection approach facilitates layer-by-layer epitaxial growth without the need for tedious multiple reactions for generating tunable shell thickness, and does not require any control over the injection rate of the SNCs, as is the case for shell growth by precursor injection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it