MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314629610 · doi:10.2524/jtappij.65.494

Advantage of Acid Sulfite Cooking as Processes of Bioethanol Production

2011· article· en· W2314629610 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfiteBiofuelPulp and paper industryChemistryProduction (economics)Environmental scienceBiochemical engineeringWaste managementOrganic chemistryEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

マグネシウムベースの酸性サルファイト廃液(SSL)中に単糖を高収率で得ることを目的とし,カラマツ(Larix leptolepis)材,アカシア(Acacia mearnsii)材,およびタケ(Phyllostachys pubescens)材の酸性サルファイト蒸煮処理を行い,炭水化物の溶出挙動を詳細に検討した。また,針葉樹材サルファイトパルプの酵素糖化性が優れている原因を明らかにするため,セルラーゼのパルプへの吸着の挙動について調査した。酸性サルファイト蒸煮をpH1.4および8時間で行った時,カラマツSSLのグルコース含有量は7.7%であり,アカシアSSLのグルコース含有量より高かった。カラマツ材グルコマンナンの溶出は,アカシア材キシランに比べて遅く,また溶出した単糖およびオリゴ糖の分解の速度も遅いということが明らかとなった。また,カラマツ材酸性サルファイトパルプの酵素糖化残さ中のリグニンに対する酵素吸着量は,30―80FPU/lignin gであり,アルカリパルプの吸着量(100―130FPU/lignin g)に比べて低かった。針葉樹材サルファイトパルプの酵素糖化性が優れている原因の一つは,パルプ中の残留リグニンの酵素吸着量が小さいためであると推定される。針葉樹材では,pH1.4の短時間の蒸解で得られたパルプを酵素により加水分解することで,効率的に単糖が得られると期待できる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it