MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314641620 · doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0677

In Vivo Generation of Dendritic Cells by Intramuscular Codelivery of FLT3 Ligand and GM-CSF Plasmids

2002· article· en· W2314641620 on OpenAlexaff
Yoav Peretz, Zheng Zhou, Fawaz Halwani, Gérald J. Prud’homme

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vivoPlasmidLigand (biochemistry)BiologyCell biologyChemistryMolecular biologyGeneGeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the major cells responsible for the uptake and the transport of antigens to regional lymphoid tissues and for the presentation of antigenic peptides to T cells. They are highly effective in immunotherapy. However, in lymphoid and other tissues, DCs constitute only a small population and are difficult to isolate in large numbers. Our objective was to devise a method with which to rapidly expand splenic DCs in vivo. We accomplished this by intramuscular injection of plasmids encoding mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-ligand (FLT3-L). Gene transfer was amplified by electroporation. Both cytokine vectors significantly increased DC numbers, but they were more effective in combination. When either control plasmid (Blank), or FLT3-L or GM-CSF expression plasmids were injected individually, the mean numbers of CD11c+/MHC II+ DCs in spleen cell suspensions were, respectively, 6, 11, and 23 million. When FLT3-L and GM-CSF plasmids were codelivered, this increased to 36 million. Peak levels occurred 7 days postinjection of DNA. To further characterize these DCs, we stained them with myeloid (CD11b, F4/80)- and lymphoid (CD8α)-related markers. FLT3-L cDNA favored lymphoid DC expansion and GM-CSF cDNA favored myeloid DC expansion, whereas combined treatment expanded both types with a myeloid predominance. We confirm the ability of these DCs to present antigen to CD4+ T cells and to stimulate in mixed lymphocyte cultures. We demonstrate that DCs can be rapidly expanded by this simple gene transfer method, which has numerous potential applications. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the major cells responsible for the uptake and the transport of antigens to regional lymphoid tissues and for the presentation of antigenic peptides to T cells. They are highly effective in immunotherapy. However, in lymphoid and other tissues, DCs constitute only a small population and are difficult to isolate in large numbers. Our objective was to devise a method with which to rapidly expand splenic DCs in vivo. We accomplished this by intramuscular injection of plasmids encoding mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-ligand (FLT3-L). Gene transfer was amplified by electroporation. Both cytokine vectors significantly increased DC numbers, but they were more effective in combination. When either control plasmid (Blank), or FLT3-L or GM-CSF expression plasmids were injected individually, the mean numbers of CD11c+/MHC II+ DCs in spleen cell suspensions were, respectively, 6, 11, and 23 million. When FLT3-L and GM-CSF plasmids were codelivered, this increased to 36 million. Peak levels occurred 7 days postinjection of DNA. To further characterize these DCs, we stained them with myeloid (CD11b, F4/80)- and lymphoid (CD8α)-related markers. FLT3-L cDNA favored lymphoid DC expansion and GM-CSF cDNA favored myeloid DC expansion, whereas combined treatment expanded both types with a myeloid predominance. We confirm the ability of these DCs to present antigen to CD4+ T cells and to stimulate in mixed lymphocyte cultures. We demonstrate that DCs can be rapidly expanded by this simple gene transfer method, which has numerous potential applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207