Optimal Priority-Free Conditionally-Preemptive Real-Time Scheduling of Periodic Tasks Based on DES Supervisory Control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a general discrete-event system (DES)-based hard periodic real-time task model. Based on supervisory control theory (SCT), an optimal priority-free real-time scheduling technique is proposed to process all the tasks running in uniprocessor or multiprocessor real-time systems (RTS). The preemption relation in this paper generalizes priority-based preemption. First, regular languages are utilized to describe the processor behavior related to each task's execution. Thereafter, the languages are represented by DES generators. Finally, the global processor behavior is generated as the synchronous product of these DES generators. By discarding the priorities, a novel preemption policy, namely conditional-preemption, is developed. Two sets of conditional-preemption specifications are developed, on the processor level and task level, respectively. Moreover, in order to control the system to be nonblocking and also limit the worst-case response time of the tasks, two corresponding sets of specifications are presented. After generating the global specification as the synchronous product, by implementing SCT the calculated supervisor can provide all the safe real-time execution sequences. The supervisor calculation can be sped up by a three-step algorithm. Finally, the real-time scheduling is implemented for real-world examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it