MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314730164 · doi:10.5150/jngcgc.2004.066-d

Rédaction d’un guide sur l’utilisation des enrochements dans les ouvrages hydrauliques, Rock Manual-2ème édition

2004· article· fr· W2314730164 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Dupray, J. Trichet, Maria Eulàlia Fons

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trois partenaires européens, Royaume-Uni, Pays-Bas et France s'associent pour produire un guide technique autoporteur sur l'utilisation des enrochements dans les ouvrages hydrauliques qui sera publié en anglais, espagnol et français.Cet article présente tout d'abord l'essentiel des références techniques disponibles sur le sujet puis les motivations et l'organisation adoptée pour la rédaction de la seconde édition du 'Manual on the use of rock in hydraulic engineering' plus connu comme le 'Rock manual'.Enfin, un point sur l'état d'avancement du projet sera proposé au lecteur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207