MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314768909 · doi:10.1127/0077-7749/2011/0152

Petrogenesis of Upper Paleozoic post-collisional peraluminous leucogranites, Sierra de Ancasti, northwest Argentina

2011· article· de· W2314768909 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandro J. Toselli, Juana N. Rossi, Miguel Ângelo Stipp Basei, Cláudia Regina Passarelli

Bibliographic record

VenueNeues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen · 2011
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsPyrogenesis (Canada)
FundersUniversidad Nacional de Tucumán
KeywordsPetrogenesisPaleozoicGeologyPolitical sciencePaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Santa Rosa and Sauce Guacho plutons are two post-collisional peraluminous Late Devonian to Early Carboniferous leucogranites that intruded the banded schists of the Ancasti Formation.The leucogranites are composed of microcline phenocrysts along with quartz, plagioclase, muscovite, biotite, ilmenite, tourmaline, apatite, monazite and zircon.Their geochemical composition is consistent with S-type granites and mineralogically they belong to MPG granites (muscoviteperaluminous granites).It is proposed that granite magma generation was related to shear zones that concentrated fluids in the metasedimentary crust during a collision or transcurrent tectonics.U-Pb analyses on monazite gave an age of 369.8 ± 5.3 Ma, while Sm/Nd isotopic data yield εNd(t) values of -5.3 for Sauce Guacho and -5.7 for Santa Rosa indicating crustal provenance.Nd model ages between 1,544 and 1,571 Ma are within the range of magmatic rocks from the Lower Ordovician Famatinian Arc in the Central Sierras Pampeanas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - AbhandlungenSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207