MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314773146 · doi:10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181d964c1

The Prognostic Value of Hemoglobin in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiotherapy

2010· article· en· W2314773146 on OpenAlex
Glòria Roldán, Alexander Chan, Michelle Buckner, Anthony M. Magliocco, Corinne Doll

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiseases of the Colon & Rectum · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemoradiotherapyInternal medicineHemoglobinGastroenterologyQuartileRetrospective cohort studyCancerSurgeryAnal cancerConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hemoglobin level on clinical outcome (local response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with anal cancer treated between 1992 and 2005 with definitive chemoradiotherapy at Tom Baker Cancer Centre. Patient treatment, laboratory, and outcome data were extracted from the chart. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy were identified. The median age was 56 years, the male-to-female ratio was 1:2, and the median tumor size was 3.5 cm. At 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, 62% of patients (38/61) had complete clinical response, and 34% (21/61) had achieved a partial clinical response. At 3 months after treatment, complete clinical response was observed in 78% (49/63) and a partial response in 16% (10/63). The median pretreatment hemoglobin level was 138.5 g/L, and the median on-treatment hemoglobin level was 129 g/L. Distant relapse was associated with hemoglobin levels in the lowest quartiles, pretreatment and on-treatment (P = .007 and P = .008, respectively). Hemoglobin levels were not associated with response at 6 weeks or 3 months. A pretreatment hemoglobin level of <130 g/L was associated with worse progression-free and overall survival (P < .0001, both). A hemoglobin on-treatment level of <121 g/L was associated with progression-free and overall survival (P < .0001 and P = .019, respectively), when stratified by gender. CONCLUSIONS: Hemoglobin status was correlated with progression-free and overall survival, and distant relapse, but not clinical response, in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal treated with chemoradiotherapy. The clinically relevant cut point, and the value of correcting hemoglobin levels before or during treatment, remains to be elucidated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it