MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314815441 · doi:10.1061/40566(260)102

Water Wave Measurement with Lidar from a Fixed Platform

2001· article· en· W2314815441 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer L. Irish, Jennifer M. Wozencraft, Alexander Cunningham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompassRemote sensingElevation (ballistics)InclinometerEnvironmental scienceLidarGeologyGeodesyEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In December 1999, a non-intrusive directional lidar wave gage (LWG) was field-tested. The LWG uses proven lidar technology to directly measure water surface elevation. So unlike bottom-mounted gages, the surface elevation measurement from the LWG is independent of other hydrodynamic processes. The prototype wave gage consists of 4 rangefinders, where each rangefinder collected water surface elevation time series at a rate of 10 Hz. A compass and inclinometer allowed for accurate positioning of the footprints on the water surface. Throughout the field test, ground truth was collected concurrently with the LWG data using a PUV (pressure gage and current meter) mounted directly beneath the LWG. This paper describes the prototype LWG and compares the directional-spectral analysis results from the LWG data with those from the ground truth data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207