MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314818031 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2016-014-7

On the Diameter of Unitary Cayley Graphs of Rings

2016· article· en· W2314818031 on OpenAlex
Huadong Su

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsCayley graphInjective functionGraphUnitary stateRing (chemistry)Discrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The unitary Cayley graph of a ring R , denoted Γ( R ), is the simple graph defined on all elements of R , and where two vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if x − y is a unit in R . The largest distance between all pairs of vertices of a graph G is called the diameter of G and is denoted by diam( G ). It is proved that for each integer n ≥ 1, there exists a ring R such that diam(Γ( R )) = n . We also show that diam(Γ( R )) ∊ {1, 2, 3,∞} for a ring R with R / J ( R ) self-injective and classify all those rings with diam(Γ( R )) = 1, 2, 3, and ∞, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it