MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314849168 · doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2546848

Experimental Investigation on a Hybrid Series Active Power Compensator to Improve Power Quality of Typical Households

2016· article· en· W2314849168 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Javadi, Abdelhamid Hamadi, L. A. Woodward, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsÉcole de technologie supérieure
KeywordsVoltage sagHarmonicsControl theory (sociology)AC powerStatic VAR compensatorActive filterCompensation (psychology)EngineeringHarmonicSwellElectric power systemVoltageVoltage regulationVoltage compensationVoltage optimisationPower factorSwitched-mode power supplyElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Computer sciencePower qualityElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a transformerless hybrid series active filter using a sliding-mode control algorithm and a notch harmonic detection technique are implemented on a single-phase distribution feeder. This method provides compensation for source current harmonics coming from a voltage fed type of nonlinear load (VSC) and reactive power regulation of a residential consumer. The realized active power filter enhances the power quality while cleaning the point of common coupling (PCC) from possible voltage distortions, sags, and swells initiated through the grid. Furthermore, to overcome drawbacks of real-time control delay, a computational delay compensation method, which accurately generates reference voltages, is proposed. Based on an improved compensation strategy, while the grid current remains clean even with a small compensation gain, voltage disturbances initiated by the power system are obstructed by the compensator, and the PCC became free of voltage harmonics and protected from sag and swell. Simulation and experimental results carried on a 1.6-kVA prototype are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations105
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207