MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314871162 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.86.021603

Tracking saddle-to-scission dynamics using<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>in projectile breakup reactions

2012· article· lv· W2314871162 on OpenAlexaff
S. Hudan, A. B. McIntosh, R. T. de Souza, S. Bianchin, John L. Black, A. Chbihi, M. Famiano, M.O. Frégeau, J. Gauthier, D. Mercier, Jocelyne Moisan, C. J. Metelko, R. Roy, C. Schwarz, W. Trautmann, R. Yáñez

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2012
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateCenter (category theory)Atomic physicsCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fragments produced in binary splits of an excited projectile-like fragment (PLF${}^{*}$) formed in the reactions ${}^{124}$Xe $+$ ${}^{112,124}$Sn at an incident energy of 50 MeV/$A$ are examined. The dependence of the isotopic composition of light fragments ($4\ensuremath{\leqslant}{Z}_{L}\ensuremath{\leqslant}8$) on rotation angle allows one to explore changes in $N/Z$ on the time scale of the rotational period of the PLF${}^{*}$. Changes in the $N/Z$ of the fragments persist for times as long as 2--3 zs (600--900 fm/$c$). The two-component nature of the time dependence of $\ensuremath{\langle}N\ensuremath{\rangle}/Z$ for ${Z}_{L}=4$ and the $Z$ dependence are related to differences in the initial configurations and subsequent decay of the PLF${}^{*}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207