MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314897095 · doi:10.1115/ipc2002-27225

Material Property Effects on Critical Buckling Strains in Energy Pipelines

2002· article· en· W2314897095 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venue4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBucklingMaterials scienceMaterial propertiesParametric statisticsYield (engineering)Structural engineeringComposite materialFinite element methodCritical loadPlateau (mathematics)MathematicsMathematical analysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigations in the development of a predictive critical buckling strain equation have shown that the grade of the material is one of five fundamental non-dimensional parameters in determining the critical local buckling strain for line pipe under combined loads. Further to this, the shape of the material curve also plays a significant role in the resulting critical buckling strain. Over 50 full-scale test specimens have been tested at the University of Alberta and effective numerical finite element analytical models have been developed. A parametric study consisting of 170 analyses was performed using the numerical models and critical buckling strain equations were derived. One of the essential variables in the new equations is a function of the specimen’s material properties. The results indicate that the higher the grade of the material the lower the value of the critical buckling strain. Furthermore, the level of agreement between the new equations and the experimental data was found to be dependent on the shape of the material curve for the specimen. Experimentally, two basic material curve shapes were observed, namely: specimens with a “rounded” material curve through the yield strength and specimens with a material property that exhibited a distinct “yield plateau” or yield point. Comparison of the experimental and numeric data showed that the specimens that were fabricated from material with a distinct yield plateau had different critical buckling strains when compared to specimens tested with rounded material curves. A subsequent parametric study was undertaken to examine the effect that the different shaped material curves had on the local and global behaviour. The results of this subsidiary parametric study showed that the global moment capacity was essentially independent of the shape of the material curve (the ratio of the peak moment from the yield plateau material to the peak moment for the rounded material was 1.018). However, the local critical buckling strain was significantly lower for the specimens analyzed with the material that had the yield plateau (the ratio of the critical strains for the two different material curves was 0.710).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it