MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314916716 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2016.2536238

A Novel 10-Bit 2.8-mW TDC Design Using SAR With Continuous Disassembly Algorithm

2016· article· en· W2314916716 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karim O. Ragab, Hassan Mostafa, Ahmed Eladawy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCairo UniversityAcademy of Scientific Research and TechnologyNational Telecommunication Regulatory AuthorityZewail City of Science and TechnologyMentor GraphicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience and Technology Development FundMinistry of Communication and Information TechnologyIntel CorporationSemiconductor Research Corporation
KeywordsAlgorithmPower consumptionComputer scienceSuccessive approximation ADCCMOSBit (key)Power (physics)Sampling (signal processing)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageTelecommunicationsPhysicsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief introduces a successive approximation time-to-digital converter based on a novel algorithm denoted as successive approximation register with continuous disassembly (SAR-CD). The main advantage of the proposed SAR-CD algorithm is that it moves the conditioning between the evaluated bits to the digital domain, after all the bits are evaluated. Simulation results show promising enhancements in power consumption compared with the state-of-the-art designs. A full 10-bit architecture is introduced using 65-nm CMOS technology as a case study with simulation power consumption of 2.8 mW at a sampling rate of 29.4 Msample/s from 1-V power supply with an effective number of bits value of 8.63 bits and a maximum differential nonlinearity of 1 least significant bit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207