Aging characteristics of the Al-Si-Cu-Mg cast alloy modified with transition metals Zr, V and Ti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hypoeutectic Al-7Si-1Cu-0.5Mg base alloy was modified with different contents of Zr, V and Ti. The wedge-shape samples with varying solidification rates during casting were subjected to isochronal aging at temperatures up to 500 °C. Moreover, as-cast and solution treated alloys were subjected to long-term isothermal aging at 150°C. As a reference, the A380 alloy, seen as commercial standard for the automotive application target, was used. The modified alloys exerted different aging characteristics than the A380 grade with higher peak hardness and lower temperature of alloy softening. Besides, the influence of the applied solidification rates on hardness after aging was less pronounced in modified alloys than in the A380 grade. For three combinations of Zr, V and Ti tested with contents of individual elements ranging from 0.14 to 0.47%, no essential differences in aging characteristics were recorded. The results are discussed in terms of the role of chemistry and heat treatment in generating precipitates contributing to the thermal stability of Al based alloys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".