Nuclear orientation of radioactive<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi></mml:math>ions implanted in the insulators<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>⋅</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CoCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>⋅</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:math>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low-temperature nuclear orientation experiments on radioactive ${}^{56}\mathrm{Mn}$ ions implanted into insulating, antiferromagnetic crystals of ${\mathrm{MnCl}}_{2}\ensuremath{\cdot}4{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ and ${\mathrm{CoCl}}_{2}\ensuremath{\cdot}6{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$ are reported. In ${\mathrm{MnCl}}_{2}\ensuremath{\cdot}4{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O},$ comparison of the $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray anisotropy of the ${}^{56}\mathrm{Mn}$ nuclei with that of ${}^{54}\mathrm{Mn},$ doped into the sample during growth, showed that both the ${}^{56}\mathrm{Mn}$ and ${}^{54}\mathrm{Mn}$ spins felt a very similar hyperfine field. The site occupancy factor in a simple, two-site model was deduced to be ${0.96}_{\ensuremath{-}0.07}^{+0.04}.$ In ${\mathrm{CoCl}}_{2}\ensuremath{\cdot}6{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O},$ the average hyperfine field for the implanted ${}^{56}\mathrm{Mn}$ was significantly less than that for ${}^{54}\mathrm{Mn}$ and corresponded to $f=0.53\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.10.$
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.974 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it