MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315061674 · doi:10.18331/sfs2016.2.2.4

Effect of Aeromonas hydrophila infection with high and normal water temperature on total hemocyte count, total plasma protein and histopathological differences in freshwater crayfish Astacus leptodactylus

2016· article· en· W2315061674 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Samnejhad, M. Afsharnasab, S Kakoolaki, A Sepahdari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrayfishAeromonas hydrophilaAstacus leptodactylusBiologyFisheryAeromonasMicrobiologyZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>Bacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the effect of water temperature on pathogenesis of Aeromonas hydrophila in freshwater Crayfish Astacus leptodactylus were investigated. In our study, The treatments Crayfish have exposed to A hydrophila with concentration of 3×10 6 CFUml -1 in high water temperature (25 ˚ C) and normal water temperature(10-15 ċ ). The untreated control groups in high water temperature (25 ˚ C) and normal water temperature (10-15 ˚ C) were disinfected by oxytetracyclin at concentration of 100 ppm for 24 hours. The haemolymph samples were withdrawn for measuring of THC and TPP. For histopathological studie, the Crayfish samples were fixed in Davidson fixative. The results showed that the value of THC in control group1 in comparing with control group2 and two other treatments at 48h after experiment time were significant (p<0.05). Also the difference of THC value between control group 2 with treatment group2 at 144h after experiment time was significant (p<0.05). The finding of TPP value showed that there was significant difference between control group1 and treatment4 in last time after experiment time (336h) (p<0.05). In infected Crayfish to bacteria with high temperature, red and black spots and also wound were observed. The result of histopathology in heptopancreas, gill, heart and digestive tract showed hemocyte aggregation, necrotized tissue, dead cells within pyknosis and karyorrehexis of nucleus and vaculation of hepatopancreas. In treatment group1 and control group1 no pathological changes of heart were observed. In digestive tract no changes were appeared in treatment1 and two others control group, but aggregation of hemocyte with pyknosis of nuclei was revealed in concentration of 3×10 6 CFUml -1 with high temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsFrench-language works237,207