MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315089886 · doi:10.1386/jdtv.4.3.313_1

The Canadian digital television transition and the limits of co-regulation

2013· article· en· W2315089886 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gregory Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Digital Television · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital televisionTransition (genetics)FellGovernment (linguistics)FaithBroadcasting (networking)Government regulationTelecommunicationsDigital broadcastingPolitical scienceBusinessComputer scienceLawGeographyComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For nearly a decade, the Canadian Government demonstrated a continued faith in industry-led initiatives for the transition to digital television that has produced outcomes that fell well short of desired goals. The results of the Canadian DTV transition challenge beliefs regarding the effectiveness of co-regulation in broadcasting policy, and present a case for recognition of the limitations of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0170.013
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Digital TelevisionSame topicDigital Platforms and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207