MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315140281 · doi:10.1586/era.11.193

Efficacy of instillations with chemotherapy or immunotherapy following endoscopic resection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

2011· review· en· W2315140281 on OpenAlexaff
Bassel G. Bachir, Wassim Kassouf

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Anticancer Therapy · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrologyBladder cancerCuffImmunotherapyUrotheliumUpper urinary tractChemotherapyTransitional cell carcinomaSurgeryCancerUrinary bladderInternal medicineUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff remains the gold-standard approach to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the relative ease by which local control can be achieved for non-muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma keeps prompting us to look into less radical and invasive methods of treating UTUC. The success of transurethral bladder tumor resection followed by intravesical therapy in controlling noninvasive bladder cancer has been firmly established. However, owing to the scarcity of patients with UTUC, there are only a few reports on the efficacy of percutaneous or endoscopic resection followed by instillation with chemotherapy or immunotherapy for UTUC, most of which have extrapolated data from bladder cancer in deciding on treatment regimens. The following manuscript portrays a comprehensive review of the literature on upper tract instillations in patients with UTUC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Anticancer TherapySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207