MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315238100 · doi:10.1061/40927(243)446

Urban Stream Restoration - Bankfull / Dominant Discharge Does Not Correlate to the LOG-Pearson Type-III 1.5 Year Return

2007· article· en· W2315238100 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. K. Annable, Chester C. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeander (mathematics)HydrographHydrology (agriculture)Return periodSampling (signal processing)Environmental scienceSedimentBed loadDrainage basinGeologyGeographySediment transportGeotechnical engineeringCartographyGeomorphologyEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ten year study has been conducted on 12 urban stream channels in southern Ontario that have remained in a state of dynamic equilibrium over the period of urbanization ranging between 30 – 120 years of development. On each study reach of no less than eight full meander wave lengths the following studies were conducted: morphometric analysis over the 60 year period of air photo coverage; longitudinal and cross-section field surveys; pavement, sub pavement and point bar samples collected and analyzed; hydrograph bedload and suspended sediment sampling was undertaken for a series of events (and used to supplement Environment Canada suspended sediment sampling programs); and, statistical analysis conducted on flow records from each of the hydrometric gauge stations located proximal to each site where continuity of flow could be assumed. The results of this paper document the many findings and results related to typical errors in estimating bankfull discharge in urban stream channels and address methods to rectify such errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207