MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315324097 · doi:10.1021/jp408192e

<i>In Situ</i>Raman Studies of Carbon Removal from High Temperature Ni–YSZ Cermet Anodes by Gas Phase Reforming Agents

2013· article· en· W2315324097 on OpenAlex
John Kirtley, Anand Singh, David M. Halat, Thomas Oswell, Josephine M. Hill, Robert A. Walker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersOffice of Naval Research
KeywordsCermetRaman spectroscopyMaterials scienceAnodeMethaneCarbon fibersAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Open-circuit voltageElectrolyteChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryChemistryMetallurgyComposite materialVoltageElectrodePhysical chemistryCeramicOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In situ vibrational Raman scattering has been employed to examine rates of carbon formation and removal from Ni/YSZ cermet anodes in functioning, electrolyte-supported solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). Specifically, Raman scattering characterized the ability of different gas phase species commonly used as reforming agents to remove carbon that had accumulated on Ni/YSZ cermet anodes at 730 °C. Anodes held at open circuit voltage (OCV) were exposed first to a dry methane feed and then to an inert carrier gas containing either H 2 O (g), CO 2, or O 2 . Carbon deposits began to form within 5 s of methane exposure. Vibrational Raman spectra showed that the carbon deposits consisted of highly ordered graphite as evidenced by a single pronounced feature in the spectra at 1556 cm –1 . Changing the incident gas phase environment over the anode to Ar containing either H 2 O (2%), CO 2 (6%), or O 2 (6%) led to quantitative removal of the carbon and partial or complete oxidation of the Ni as evidenced by the growth of a NiO vibrational band (at 1080 cm –1 ) in the Raman spectra. Carbon removal rates from the Ni/YSZ anode were fastest with vapor phase H 2 O, then O 2, and finally slowest with CO 2 . The extent of Ni oxidation was much more pronounced with O 2 than with either H 2 O or CO 2 . These chemical processes observed directly in the Raman spectra were reflected in the device’s open circuit voltage (OCV). Correlating findings from these two methods— in situ Raman spectroscopy and voltage measurements—provided a direct connection between the chemical composition of SOFC anodes and the electrochemical condition of the device. These results inspire confidence that any of the reforming agents used—H 2 O, O 2, and CO 2 —will remove carbon from Ni anodes quantitatively on a time scale of ∼10 to ∼125 s. However, H 2 O and CO 2 appear less likely to damage the cell following carbon removal, as H 2 O and CO 2 do not quantitatively oxidize the Ni in the cermet anode. In contrast, exposure to O 2 leads to much more extensive Ni oxidation and an OCV that approaches 0.0 V, implying that the Ni/NiO equilibrium sustained by H 2 O and CO 2 is driven completely to NiO by O 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it