MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315334155 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152466

Diel Surface Temperature Range Scales with Lake Size

2016· article· en· W2315334155 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Iestyn Woolway, Ian D. Jones, Stephen C. Maberly, Jon French, David M. Livingstone, Donald T. Monteith, Gavin L. Simpson, Stephen J. Thackeray, Mikkel René Andersen, Richard W. Battarbee, Curtis L. DeGasperi, Chris Evans, Elvira de Eyto, Heidrun Feuchtmayr, David P. Hamilton, Martin Kernan, Jan Krokowski, Alon Rimmer, Kevin C. Rose, James A. Rusak, David B. Ryves, Daniel R. Scott, Ewan M. Shilland, Robyn L. Smyth, Peter A. Stæhr, R. M. Thomas, Susan Waldron, Gesa A. Weyhenmeyer

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksUniversity of Regina
FundersUniversity College LondonNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UKGlobal Lake Ecological Observatory NetworkUniversity of Waikato
KeywordsDiel vertical migrationRange (aeronautics)Environmental scienceBiologyEcologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecological and biogeochemical processes in lakes are strongly dependent upon water temperature. Long-term surface warming of many lakes is unequivocal, but little is known about the comparative magnitude of temperature variation at diel timescales, due to a lack of appropriately resolved data. Here we quantify the pattern and magnitude of diel temperature variability of surface waters using high-frequency data from 100 lakes. We show that the near-surface diel temperature range can be substantial in summer relative to long-term change and, for lakes smaller than 3 km2, increases sharply and predictably with decreasing lake area. Most small lakes included in this study experience average summer diel ranges in their near-surface temperatures of between 4 and 7°C. Large diel temperature fluctuations in the majority of lakes undoubtedly influence their structure, function and role in biogeochemical cycles, but the full implications remain largely unexplored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207