In situ LA–ICP–MS dating of monazite from aluminous gneisses: insights on the tectono-metamorphic history of a granulite-facies domain in the central Grenville Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In situ U–Pb dating of monazite from granulite-facies anatectic aluminous gneisses of the hinterland of the Grenville Province (Manicouagan area) is used to constrain the age of metamorphic events. Matrix grains in these rocks show complex internal textures consistent with extensive corrosion and overgrowths which are attributed to partial dissolution of earlier monazite in anatectic melt followed by new growth during melt crystallization or subsequent fluid infiltration. The new monazite data show the following: (i) inherited “pre-Grevillian” ages up to ca. 1400 Ma in some rocks; (ii) “main Grenvillian” ages in the general range of ca. 1070–1020 Ma, with a variable spread in individual samples and a general cluster at 1070–1050 Ma; and (iii) “late Grenvillian” ages at ca. 1010–990 Ma, mostly restricted to backscatter electron (BSE)-bright rims of matrix grains. The wide age range of the main Grenvillian metamorphism suggests episodic growth of monazite over a wide time span, consistent with protracted residence of the host rocks under high-temperature conditions. The clusters in the age distribution likely represent major episodes of melt crystallization in the respective rocks, following the granulite-facies metamorphism. In contrast, the growth of the late Grenvillian monazite at ca. 1000 Ma is attributed to late fluid infiltration of the host rocks under greenschist-facies conditions, coeval with ultrapotassic magmatism. It is the first report of a late Grenvillian metamorphic overprint on granulite-facies mineral assemblages in the hinterland and is consistent with the model of extensional collapse of the orogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".