MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315453971 · doi:10.1021/ef201545q

Liquid–Liquid Phase Equilibria in Asphaltene + Polystyrene + Toluene Mixtures at 293 K

2011· article· en· W2315453971 on OpenAlexaff
M. Khammar, John M. Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneAsphaltenePhase (matter)TolueneMolar massAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryTernary operationHydrocarbonAtmospheric pressureFlocculationChromatographyMaterials scienceChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phase behavior of hydrocarbon mixtures where one of the constituents self-aggregates is a subject of significant industrial and academic interest. Here, a nonintrusive acoustic phased-array technique operated in pulse echo mode is used to investigate the phase behavior of asphaltenes, a well-known self-aggregating species, in mixtures with polystyrene and toluene at 293 K and atmospheric pressure. This mixture exhibits liquid–liquid phase behavior where both liquids are opaque to visible light, are of uniform composition, and are stable over broad ranges of composition. One phase is asphaltene rich and the other phase is polystyrene rich. Varying the polystyrene mean molar mass had little impact on the liquid to liquid–liquid phase boundaries. Liquid–liquid critical points were identified and phase compositions were confirmed for a fixed global composition using the UV–visible spectrophotometry and mass balance equations. This is the first report of liquid–liquid phase behavior for such mixtures. Depletion flocculation is hypothesized to be the mechanism causing phase separation in this ternary mixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207