MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2315481411 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-1696

Abstract 1696: Targeting EVI1-overexpressing AML with darinaparsin

2012· article· en· W2315481411 on OpenAlexaff
Koren K. Mann, Nathalie A. Johnson, Torsten Holm Nielsen, Nicolas Garnier, Stanley Kwan, Eftihia Cocolakis, Josée Hébert, Robert Morgan, Wilson H. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenic trioxideMedicineInternal medicineCancer researchBone marrowOncologyBiologyApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Activation of EVI1, due to chromosomal translocation, inversion or transcriptional upregulation, occurs in 8-10% of AML and results in both activation and repression of specific gene sets. Importantly, the tumor suppressor PTEN is repressed by EVI1. Arsenic trioxide targets EVI1 for degradation, suggesting that arsenicals may be effective in treating EVI1-positive malignancies. Indeed, MDS patients with EVI1 deregulation had greater benefit from the combination of arsenic trioxide (inorganic arsenic) and thalidomide than patients without EVI1 deregulation. Here, we describe the use of a novel organic arsenical, darinaparsin, to treat a patient with EVI1-overexpressing AML. A 36 year old woman was diagnosed with AML inv(3)(q21q26.2) where two copies of inv(3) were detected. Her initial treatment included two induction regimens followed by an allogeneic stem cell transplant. She had a complete remission lasting 5 years after which time her AML relapsed. After three high dose regimens and another investigational combination therapy failed to induce remission (>80% blasts in the bone marrow), we treated the patient's peripheral blasts ex vivo and found that darinaparsin induced significantly more cell death than arsenic trioxide. Thus, the patient started darinaparsin (300 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes for 5 days every 21 days). Within 10 hours of receiving her first dose, her fever and night sweats had resolved. Her performance status and appetite improved, and she was discharged home 2 days after her last dose. Unlike previous drug regimens, darinaparsin allowed the patient to enjoy a good quality of life for more than 30 days with an ECOG performance status of 1. Unfortunately, while darinaparsin stabilized her peripheral white blood cell counts, the patient died of extramedullary manifestations and complications of her AML, 12 days after receiving a second cycle of darinaparsin. Darinaparsin decreased her peripheral white blood cell counts during the five days of treatment, which was followed by an additional decrease in the white blood cell count when serum arsenic levels were low to undetectable. We observed visible nuclear and cytoplasmic blebbing consistent with apoptosis. Despite the anti-tumor activity, neither EVI1 protein levels nor the transcriptional repression activity as measured by PTEN mRNA expression were altered within the first 72 hours of darinaparsin treatment. cDNA microarray expression profiling showed a dramatic change in gene expression of her tumor between the first and second cycle, including a significant increase in the pro-survival NF-κB pathway. NF-κB family member (i.e. NFKB1, 2, IA, IB, IE, RELA, TANK, TRAF1 and TRAF2) mRNA expression increased 2-8 fold following the first cycle of darinaparsin. Based on our clinical observations and correlative studies, future studies will investigate a link between EVI1 overexpression, NF-κB signaling and darinaparsin sensitivity. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1696. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1696

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→