Electrogastrography in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impaired gastrointestinal motility in Parkinson's disease may affect absorption of levodopa and contribute to the disabling response fluctuations (RF). In this study gastric myoelectric activity was recorded with electrogastrography in patients with PD and correlated with the duration, severity and the presence of RF. METHOD: Electrogastrography (EGG) was performed in 36 patients with PD of which 22 were men. The mean age was 67 years (48-81), mean duration of disease was 7.07 years (1-20), and mean duration of treatment with levodopa was 5.07 years (1-20). Gastric dysrhythmia was diagnosed when either preprandial or postprandial dysrhythmia for more than 30% of the recording period was detected. RESULTS: The EGG was abnormal in 24 of 36 patients. Significant association was found between preprandial dysrhythmia and duration of disease (P=0.002); duration of levodopa treatment (P=0.003), severity of 86RF (P=0.001), but not with age (P=0.076). Out of 18 patients with RF, 17 had at least one pattern of dysrhythmia. In 11 out of the 18 patients without RF, the EGG was normal while the remaining seven had at least one pattern of dysrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Abnormal EGG was quite common in this group of patients with PD, particularly in those with RF. The most common pattern of abnormality was preprandial dysrhythmia, which was positively associated with disease duration and length of levodopa treatment. Although frequently asymptomatic, preprandial dysrhythmia leading to impaired gastric emptying may contribute to irregular absorption of levodopa from the small intestine and contribute to disabling response fluctuations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".