MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315548960 · doi:10.2310/7750.2009.09001

Antepartum Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Refractory Pemphigoid Gestationis: Case Report and Literature Review

2010· review· en· W2315548960 on OpenAlexaff
Philip Doiron, Melanie D. Pratt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntravenous Immunoglobulin TherapyRefractory (planetary science)DermatologyPemphigoidAntibodyBullous pemphigoidImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: pemphigoid gestationis is an autoimmune blistering disease affecting pregnant women. Treatment often consists of topical corticosteroids, oral antihistamines, and oral prednisone followed by immunosuppressants. Refractory cases in antepartum patients present a particular therapeutic challenge as the majority of second-line agents are contraindicated until the patient has delivered. OBJECTIVE: the following report describes the case of a 34-year-old woman pregnant for the third time at 16 weeks' gestation. Her previous two pregnancies were complicated by pemphigoid gestationis but were successfully managed with oral prednisone and topical agents. During her third pregnancy, the initial lesions were controlled with oral prednisone, but attempts to decrease her dose resulted in disease flare. CONCLUSION: monthly infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin (40 g intravenously for 3 consecutive days for 120 g total) proved to be successful in reducing the dose of oral prednisone required to maintain disease remission. A healthy baby was delivered at 37.5 weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207