MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315555627 · doi:10.4296/cwrj3602849

The Influence of Air Temperature on Water Temperature and the Concentration of Dissolved Oxygen in Newfoundland Rivers

2011· article· en· W2315555627 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Richard Harvey, Leonard M. Lye, Ali Khan, Renée Paterson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAir temperatureWater qualityHydrology (agriculture)OxygenCurrent (fluid)Limiting oxygen concentrationMeteorologyChemistryEcologyGeographyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper regression models are developed for predicting water temperature and the concentration of dissolved oxygen in rivers monitored by the Newfoundland and Labrador Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring (RTWQM) network. The developed models can be used to predict mean, maximum and minimum water temperatures and dissolved oxygen at the monthly, weekly and daily time scales. A nonlinear logistic model is found to best represent the S-shaped relationship between water temperature at the real-time stations and air temperature collected from meteorological stations 5-50 kilometers away. There is a clear tendency for monthly and weekly models to be more accurate for prediction than the daily models. Both linear and nonlinear exponential decay models were found to best represent the relationship between water temperature and dissolved oxygen at the real-time stations. A novel graphical method of linking air temperature to water temperature and dissolved oxygen has been developed and may prove to be a valuable simple tool in the assessment of the health of the rivers in the real-time network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2011
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207