MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315581617 · doi:10.1149/1.3570182

Performance of Metal-Supported Composite and Single-Phase Cathodes Based on LSCF and SSC

2011· article· en· W2315581617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCathodeMaterials scienceMicrostructurePolarization (electrochemistry)Raw materialComposite numberComposite materialMetalMetallurgyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cathodes based on La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ (LSCF) and Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3-δ (SSC) were fabricated by axial-injection plasma spraying using dry powder feedstock. Composite cathodes were produced with up to 40 wt. % Ce0.80Sm0.20O2-δ (SDC) in the feedstock. The processing parameters were varied to produce cathodes with different mechanical properties and microstructures. The best-performing LSCF-SDC cathode had a polarization resistance (Rp) of 0.101 Ωcm² at 750°C, and the best-performing SSC cathode had a polarization resistance of 0.0056 Ωcm².

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it