ROUTE: run‐time robust reducer workload estimation for MapReduce
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary MapReduce has become a popular model for large‐scale data processing in recent years. Many works on MapReduce scheduling (e.g., load balancing and deadline‐aware scheduling) have emphasized the importance of predicting workload received by individual reducers. However, because the input characteristics and user‐specified map function of a given job are unknown to the MapReduce framework before the job starts, accurately predicting workload of reducers can be a difficult challenge. To address this challenge, we present ROUTE, a run‐time robust reducer workload estimation technique for MapReduce. ROUTE progressively samples the partition size of the early completed mappers, allowing ROUTE to perform estimation at run time yet fulfilling the accuracy requirement specified by users. Moreover, by using robust estimation and bootstrapping resampling techniques, ROUTE can achieve high applicability to a wide variety of applications. Through experiments using both real and synthetic data on an 11‐node Hadoop cluster, we show ROUTE can achieve high accuracy with error rate no more than 10.92% and an improvement of 40.6% in terms of error rate while compared with the state‐of‐the‐art solution. Besides, through simulations using synthetic data, we show that ROUTE is robust to a variety of skewed distributions. Finally, we apply ROUTE to existing load balancing and deadline‐aware scheduling frameworks and show ROUTE significantly improves the performance of these frameworks. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it