Improved Electrolyte Performance in Plasma Sprayed SOFCs by Electrode Modification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrolytes were deposited by atmospheric suspension plasma spraying (SPS) in metal-supported SOFCs having both anode- and cathode-down configurations. The electrodes on the metal supports were intentionally made thin (< 30 μm) and smooth (average roughness < 2.5 μm) to reduce the formation of segmentation cracks and concentrated porosity in the electrolytes. In the anode-down cells, the electrolytes had minimal concentrated porosity and no segmentation cracks were observed. Open circuit voltages (OCVs) were above 1.05 V at 750 °C in cells with 21 μm thick electrolytes. The electrolytes in cathode-down cells had higher leak rates than those in the anode-down cells, and segmentation cracks were observed in some cathode-down cell electrolytes. The cathode-down cells having the most gas-tight electrolytes were electrochemically tested. OCVs were initially above 1.04 V, though performance declined significantly within 2-4 hours. In contrast, the OCVs of the anode-down cells were approximately constant after 12 hours of testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".