MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315628421 · doi:10.1021/es404980x

Analysis of the Mo Speciation in the JEB Tailings Management Facility at McClean Lake, Saskatchewan

2014· article· en· W2315628421 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John R. Hayes, Andrew P. Grosvenor, John Rowson, Kebbi A. Hughes, Ryan Frey, Joel W. Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsTailingsXANESGenetic algorithmFerrihydriteStrontiumEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceChemistryMineralogySpectroscopyAdsorptionMaterials scienceMetallurgyEcologyPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The JEB Tailings Management Facility (TMF) is central to reducing the environmental impact of the uranium ore processing operation located at the McClean Lake facility and operated by AREVA Resources Canada (AREVA). The geochemical controls of this facility are largely designed around the idea that elements of concern, such as Mo, will be controlled in the very long term through equilibrium with supporting minerals. However, these systems are far from equilibrium when the tailings are first placed in the TMF, and it can take years, decades, or centuries to reach equilibrium. Therefore, it is necessary to understand how these reactions evolve toward an equilibrium state to understand the very long-term behavior of the TMF and to ensure that the elements of concern will be adequately contained. To this end, the Mo speciation in a series of samples taken from the JEB TMF during the 2008 sampling campaign has been analyzed. This analysis was performed using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence mapping (μ-XRF), and X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES). These results show that only XANES was effective in speciating Mo in the tailings samples, because it was both element-specific and sensitive enough to detect the low concentrations of Mo present. These results show that the predominant Mo-bearing phases present in the TMF are powellite, ferrimolybdite, and molybdate adsorbed on ferrihydrite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207