MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315632534 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2005-054-8

Separation of Variables for

2005· article· en· W2315632534 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Samuel A. Lopes

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade do PortoUniversidade de São PauloCanadian Mathematical SocietyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsSubalgebraUniversal enveloping algebraAlgebra over a fieldCenter (category theory)Pure mathematicsFiltered algebraCellular algebraPolynomialAlgebra representationMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let be the positive part of the quantized enveloping algebra . Using results of Alev–Dumas and Caldero related to the center of , we show that this algebra is free over its center. This is reminiscent of Kostant's separation of variables for the enveloping algebra U(g) of a complex semisimple Lie algebra g, and also of an analogous result of Joseph–Letzter for the quantum algebra Ŭq(g). Of greater importance to its representation theory is the fact that is free over a larger polynomial subalgebra N in n variables. Induction from N to provides infinite-dimensional modules with good properties, including a grading that is inherited by submodules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207