MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315662222 · doi:10.1021/ja502705y

Probing the Free Energy Landscape of the Fast-Folding gpW Protein by Relaxation Dispersion NMR

2014· article· en· W2315662222 on OpenAlexafffund
Celia Sanchez-Medina, Ashok Sekhar, Pramodh Vallurupalli, Michele Cerminara, Víctor Muñoz, Lewis E. Kay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryEnergy landscapeFolding (DSP implementation)Protein foldingDownhill foldingNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyChemical physicsContact orderCrystallographyPhi value analysisRelaxation (psychology)Dispersion (optics)Native stateStereochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topographic features of the free energy landscapes that govern the thermodynamics and kinetics of conformational transitions in proteins, which in turn are integral for function, are not well understood. This reflects the experimental challenges associated with characterizing these multidimensional surfaces, even for small proteins. Here we focus on a 62-residue protein, gpW, that folds very rapidly into a native structure with an α/β topology in which α-helices are at the N- and C-terminal ends of the molecule with a central β-hairpin positioned orthogonally to the helices. Using relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy to probe the conformational fluctuations in gpW at 1 °C, we found that the native state interconverts with a transiently formed, sparsely populated second state with a lifetime of 250 μs, consistent with the global folding-unfolding rate under these conditions. In this low-populated state, the β-hairpin is unfolded whereas the α-helices remain predominantly formed. Our results argue for a hierarchical stability of secondary structural elements and demonstrate the existence of a complex free energy landscape even in this small, fast-folding single-domain protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207