Fatal Pulmonary Embolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: We report a case of pulmonary embolism of polymethylmethacrylate material after percutaneous vertebroplasty. OBJECTIVE: To describe a severe vertebroplasty complication, the pulmonary embolism, which proved to be fatal in a patient with many chronic disabilities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Until 2007, the literature noted that the risk of embolism of polymethylmethacrylate after a percutaneous vertebroplasty counted a small number of pulmonary cement embolism and a smaller number of fatal consequences. The most recent research revealed that the risk of a pulmonary cement embolism ranges from 3.5% to 23% for osteoporotic compression fractures. METHODS: This study is a case report of an 80-year-old patient with multiple medical comorbid factors, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mild renal failure, osteoporosis, and hepatic cirrhosis. Symptoms of pulmonary embolism developed 1 month after a percutaneous vertebroplasty. An echocardiography report suggested that the cement infiltrated the right atrium and the right pulmonary artery, and this was confirmed by a computed tomographic scan. As the therapy with oxygen and low-molecular-weight heparin failed to solve the thrombus, the patient required a surgical tricuspid annuloplasty and the extirpation of the right atrial and right pulmonary masses. RESULTS: The course of the operation was complicated by pulmonary infection, and the patient ultimately succumbed to infection/respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: The presence of intravascular/intracardiac foreign bodies is underreported in literature, but it is quite common in clinical practice. We need to discuss the choice of some non-risk-free interventions such as vertebroplasty in older patients already affected by multiple main disabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".