MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

INDIVIDUALS WITH CHRONIC STROKE DEMONSTRATE MUSCLE TORQUE-ANGLE IMPAIRMENT IN THE PARETIC KNEE AND COMPENSATORY STRENGTH GAINS IN THE NONPARETIC KNEE.

2004· article· en· W2315721370 on OpenAlexaff
Melanie J. Lomaglio, Janice J. Eng, D. L. MacIntyrc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exercisePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineStroke (engine)Analysis of varianceKnee JointElbowPost-hoc analysisElbow flexionPost hocMuscle weaknessPhysical therapyOrthodonticsAnatomySurgeryInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Recent reports suggest that the paretic arm of individuals with stroke produces lower elbow flexion and extension torques (when normalized to peak torque) at short muscle lengths when compared to individuals without stroke. Thus the purpose of this study was to determine whether this phenomenon also exists in the paretic and non-paretic knee when assessed across multiple joint angles. NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: Sixteen subjects with chronic stroke and 14 age-matched control subjects without stroke were voluntarily recruited from the community. MATERIALS/METHODS: Maximal isometric knee extension and flexion joint torques were measured at six different angles (15, 35, 55, 75, 95, and 105 degrees). Due to the high variability of muscle weakness, both between and within subjects, each subject's data points were normalized and expressed as a percentage of their own peak torque. Mean normalized extension and flexion torque-angle curves of the paretic and nonparetic knee were compared with each other and with the nondominant knee of control subjects using a two-factor (subject group, knee joint angle) mixed design analysis of variance (ANOVA). If significant subject group by joint angle interactions were revealed, post-hoc pairwise comparisons with a Bonferonni adjustment were performed to determine relative muscle strength of the paretic, nonparetic, and control conditions at each angle tested. RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between subject group (paretic, nonparetic, and control) and knee joint angle for the extensors (P = .002), but not the flexors (P = .386). Post-hoc tests for the extensors revealed the paretic knee to be relatively weaker than the control knee at 15 degrees of flexion (i.e. short muscle lengths) (P = .006). In addition, the nonparetic knee was relatively stronger than the control knee at 95 (P = .004) and 105 (P = .007) degrees of flexion (i.e. long muscle lengths). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this work suggest that the paretic knee extensors are selectively weak when required to contract at short muscle lengths. This agrees with the clinical observation that the quadriceps is more severely impaired as the knee joint approaches terminal extension, particularly during gait. In addition, the nonparetic quadriceps is selectively stronger than the control quadriceps when required to contract at long muscle lengths; suggesting individuals with stroke compensate through overuse of the nonparetic side during functional activities such as sit-to-stand and stair climbing. This learned nonuse of the paretic leg leads to a task specific increase in quadriceps strength of the nonparetic knee at long muscle lengths. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rehabilitation interventions should emphasize paretic knee strengthening near terminal extension and encourage symmetrical use of the paretic and nonparetic legs to enhance recovery of strength throughout functional range of motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurologic Physical TherapySame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207