MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315747522 · doi:10.1177/1077699014531197

Book Review: <i>Understanding Occupy from Wall Street to Portland</i> , edited by Renee Guarriello Heath, Courtney Vail Fletcher, and Ricardo Munoz

2014· article· en· W2315747522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lyell Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnarchism and Radical Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedia studiesPoliticsContext (archaeology)CapitalismPolitical scienceSociologyArt historyEconomic historyHistoryLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding Occupy from Wall Street to Portland. Renee Guarriello Heath, Courtney Vail Fletcher, and Ricardo Munoz, eds. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2013. 264 pp. $90 hbk. $89.99 ebook.Late in 2011, the Occupy movement shook the U.S. political landscape with a force not achieved by any protest movement since the 1960s. Drawing inspiration from the Arab Spring and national protest movements opposed to post-recession austerity mea- sures, Occupy Wall Street was initiated by a call from Canadian culture-jammers Adbusters for a peaceful occupation of Wall Street. The subsequent occupation of Lower Manhattan's Zuccotti Park brought a sustained, popular mass protest against neoliberal globalization to world capitalism's financial center.The popular convergence soon thereafter became a global protest movement as Occupy-inspired demonstrations sprouted in hundreds of locations in over eighty countries. Among them was Occupy Portland, on America's west coast, the site of research for Renee Guarriello Heath, Courtney Vail Fletcher, and Ricardo Munoz's edited collection Understanding Occupy from Wall Street to Portland. Heath is an associate professor of communication studies and Fletcher is an assistant professor of communication studies-both at the University of Portland-and Munoz is a PhD student in communication at the University of Colorado, Boulder.Organized into three sections, the collection situates Occupy in a global context, interrogates the operation of the movement at the micro level in Portland, and examines local media representations of the protest. The topics addressed by the first of these sections, titled Situating Occupy Globally: The Cultural and Economic Context, pro- vide readers with a wide frame through which to understand Occupy Portland's conver- gence. However, the chapters in this section restate histories and themes that are likely to be familiar to many readers already. It is in the two subsequent sections, where Occupy Portland itself is examined, that the collection is most compelling.Over the four chapters of the second section, the various contributors deliver a nicely targeted exploration of the internal operation of Occupy Portland. Munoz's and Heath's contributions are particularly compelling: Munoz describes the Occupy movement's determination to work in a genuinely participatory way, with decision- making occurring horizontally among the people involved, rather than vertically as it would if it were left to a conventional leadership group. But the creation and mainte- nance of Occupy's horizontal organizational structure was massively challenging: not only did those present have to develop new communication frameworks to sup- port this way of working, but they also had to do it in an environment charged with emotions, and with the constant threat of intervention by police. The nuanced ethnog- raphy Munoz delivers on these matters is the outcome of participant-observation; he researched the movement while fully taking part in Occupy Portland.Addressing similar themes, Heath's research explores some of the pitfalls inherent to participatory organizing of the kind in operation: groups that appear to have no hierarchy may actually be masking an unequal distribution of power within them, whereas decision-making through mass assemblies can be chaotic and ineffective, making ever-present the danger that mob rule and not meaningful strategic thinking will take over. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicAnarchism and Radical PoliticsFrench-language works237,207