MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Duplication of the Leg — Renal Agenesis: Congenital Malformation Syndrome

2000· article· en· W2315823841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesonephrosMedicineMesodermRenal agenesisAgenesisSupernumeraryGene duplicationAnatomyDysgenesisKidneyInternal medicineGeneticsBiologyEmbryonic stem cellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A case is given of a male born with a duplication of the left leg and ipsilateral kidney agenesis. Although the etiology is unknown, we believe this association represents a congenital malformation syndrome. It is a polytopic developmental field defect. The growth factor IGF-I produced by the intermediary mesoderm or mesonephros (embryonary kidney) could be implicated in the induction limb development and the application of FGF-8 protein to the flank of young chick embryos inducing the development of additional limbs. It is possible that one or more of the growth factors produced by the mesonephros take some cells of the intermediary mesoderm out of their renal way to form a supernumerary limb.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it