Stepwise Intramolecular Photoisomerization of NHC-Chelate Dimesitylboron Compounds with C–C Bond Formation and C–H Bond Insertion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C,C-chelate dimesitylboron (BMes(2)) compounds containing an N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) donor have been obtained. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses established that the boron atom in these compounds is bound by four carbon atoms in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. Compared to previously reported N,C-chelate dimesitylboron compounds, the new C,C-chelate boron compounds have a much larger HOMO-LUMO energy gap (>3.60 eV). They do, however, respond to UV irradiation (300 nm) in the same manner as N,C-chelate BMes(2) compounds do, undergoing photoisomerization and converting to an intensely colored (yellow or orange) isomer A quantitatively, with a high quantum efficiency (0.60-0.75). NMR and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses established that the structure of A is similar to the dark isomers obtained from N,C-chelate BMes(2) compounds. However, unlike the N,C-chelate dark isomers that have the tendency to thermally reverse back to the light colored isomers, the isomers A of the C,C-chelate BMes(2) are thermally stable and no reverse isomerization was observed even when heated to 80 °C (or 110 °C) for hours. The most unusual finding is that isomers A undergo further photoisomerization when irradiated at 350 nm, forming a new colorless species B nearly quantitatively. NMR and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses established the structure of isomer B, which may be considered as an intramolecular C-H insertion product via a borylene intermediate. Mechanistic aspects of this unusual two-step photoisomerization process have been examined by DFT computational studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".