MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315890359 · doi:10.1021/je500096r

High Temperature Diffusion Coefficients for O<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>, and OH in Water, and for Pure Water

2014· article· en· W2315890359 on OpenAlexaff
Dimitrios T. Kallikragas, Andriy Plugatyr, Igor M. Svishchev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSubcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySupercritical fluidDiffusionThermodynamicsAqueous solutionPolynomialLogarithmAtmospheric temperature rangeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Classical molecular dynamics simulations using simple point charge water potential were performed to obtain high temperature diffusion coefficients for pure water, and for O 2, H 2, and OH radical in an infinitely dilute aqueous solution. The simulations were carried out at temperatures ranging from ambient to 973 K and system densities from 0.1 to 1.0 g cm –3 . A logarithmic density expansion of a hard sphere collision model was used to formulate a polynomial fit to the diffusion data and four sets of fitting coefficients are presented. Fourteen coefficients were sufficient to accurately reproduce mass transport coefficients in water at high temperatures and at supercritical conditions. Our parametric fits can be used to estimate diffusion coefficients for these species in a wide range of thermodynamic states, including those relevant to the GEN IV supercritical water cooled nuclear reactor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicSubcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesFrench-language works237,207