MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315904295 · doi:10.1525/phr.2015.84.4.565

Review: Sovereign Screens: Aboriginal Media on the Canadian West Coast by Kristin L. Dowell

2015· article· en· W2315904295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grace L. Dillon

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Historical Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconWest coastCitationHistoryDownloadArt historyLibrary scienceMedia studiesWorld Wide WebComputer scienceSociologyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| November 01 2015 Review: Sovereign Screens: Aboriginal Media on the Canadian West Coast by Kristin L. Dowell Sovereign Screens: Aboriginal Media on the Canadian West Coast. By Kristin L. Dowell. (Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 2013. xxviii + 267 pp. $50 cloth) Grace L. Dillon Grace L. Dillon Portland State University Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Pacific Historical Review (2015) 84 (4): 565–567. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2015.84.4.565 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Grace L. Dillon; Review: Sovereign Screens: Aboriginal Media on the Canadian West Coast by Kristin L. Dowell. Pacific Historical Review 1 November 2015; 84 (4): 565–567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2015.84.4.565 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentPacific Historical Review Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2015 by the Pacific Coast Branch, American Historical Association2015 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207