MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315917063 · doi:10.14288/1.0052922

Seismicity along the continental margin of Vancouver Island

2010· article· en· W2315917063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D César Germán Castellanos

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyContinental marginInduced seismicitySeismologyMargin (machine learning)SeismotectonicsTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oceanic Juan de Fuca and Explorer plates are subducting beneath the continental North America plate west of Vancouver Island at rates of 47 mm/yr and 21 mm/yr, respectively. The Nootka fault zone, which is the boundary between the two subducting plates, experiences left-lateral shear due to their different rate of subduction. The Juan de Fuca/North America interaction vector is normal to the boundary beneath central-south Vancouver Island and oblique beneath western Washington. During the last 15 years, seismograph station coverage in western Canada has been adequate to record a good number of small magnitude earthquakes lying mainly in three regions: the Nootka fault zone, the Georgia Strait-Puget Sound region, and along the west coast of Vancouver Island and immediate offshore region. A detailed study of seismicity data in the Vancouver Island and offshore region, within the depth range of 25-55 km and recorded in the Canadian Earthquake Catalogue during the period 1976-1989, has been undertaken. The objectives of this study are to determine the frequency of occurrence and b-value, to improve the hypocentral locations and to interpret them in terms of both structure and the subductions process, and to examine the focal mechanisms to gain understanding of the stress field. A total of 127 earthquakes satisfied the depth range criteria and were analyzed in detail. Earthquake depths, recalculated with a recently determined velocity structure from refraction-reflection data and using the best station distribution and the more reliable arrival times, delineate a zone of seismicity beneath central-south Vancouver Island. The hypocenters show a distinct band of activity which extends ~60 km down-dip at a distance range of 35 to 95 km from the shelf edge and at a depth of 25 to 45 km. The structure is about 9 km thick and dips at an angle of 14° at N29°E. Most of these deep earthquakes are located in the subducting oceanic crust, a conclusion consistent with the position of the oceanic plate from other geophysical studies. The b-value of the magnitude-frequency distribution calculated as 0.79 also is consistent with the conclusion of the seismicity occurring within the slab, on the basis of similar studies in western Washington and in other subduction zones. Areally, the new results confirm previous suggestions that the subducting plate is arched below the Georgia Strait-Puget Sound region. Composite focal mechanism solutions constructed for five groups of earthquakes show strike-slip and normal faulting mechanisms, but no thrust events. This important result confirms, at the small magnitude level, previous observations of the absence of thrust faulting earthquakes. Normal faulting may be associated with plate bending, an expected result, but the strike-slip mechanisms which suggest lateral shearing within the subducting plate, are an unexpected result. The composite of P (pressure) and T (tension) axes does not show a preferred orientation; the only noticeable feature is that the T axes indicate in-plane tensions. The diversity in the orientation of the P and T axes suggests a more complex state of stresses in the subducted slab than expected from the application of a normal subduction model. Such a complexity may be related to the arched plate geometry, to stresses generated by phase changes in the plate and to plate interactions at their boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207