MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2315949533 · doi:10.1353/can.2008.0001

Roughnecks, Rock Bits and Rigs: The Evolution of Oil Well Drilling Technology in Alberta, 1883–1970 (review)

2007· article· en· W2315949533 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Paul Chastko

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingPetroleum industryGeologyFossil fuelPetroleum engineeringMining engineeringEngineeringPaleontologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Roughnecks, Rock Bits and Rigs: The Evolution of Oil Well Drilling Technology in Alberta, 1883–1970 Paul Chastko Roughnecks, Rock Bits and Rigs: The Evolution of Oil Well Drilling Technology in Alberta, 1883–1970. Sandy Gow. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2005. Pp. 451. $44.95. Sandy Gow's Roughnecks, Rock Bits and Rigs is a thoroughly researched and detailed account of the evolution of oil and gas drilling technology from the last quarter of the nineteenth century until the 1970s. This modest description, however, only begins to scratch the surface, because Gow's research investigates the interrelationship between the evolution of technology and the economic and social changes that have occurred in the Canadian oil and gas industry. The book's twelve chapters can be divided into four thematic sections. The first provides a primer on the basic history of Alberta's oil and gas industry and the geology of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, while part two is a brief discussion of early drilling technology. The third part, which represents more than one-third of the book's 338 pages of text, presents a comprehensive examination of the development and evolution of the rotary rig. The volume concludes with a brief section on the problems and challenges faced by drillers working in Alberta. It is somewhat ironic that, in studying the Canadian oil industry, historians have largely overlooked the changes that affected oil well drilling – a striking absence considering that the bulk of western Canada's conventional oil deposits would still remain untapped if not for the improvements that have come along in drilling systems. At the heart of Gow's account is the transition from cable tool to rotary rig technology in the first half of the twentieth century. Although rotary rigs could outperform cable tool set ups and were more cost-effective, they were adopted only gradually by Alberta drillers because they were more expensive and required more skilled and experienced hands to operate – two crucial ingredients largely absent from the Alberta industry in the first decades of the twentieth century. Paradoxically, the presence of the larger American oil and gas industry just south of the border served as both a stimulant and an inhibitor to early Canadian industry. While the free exchange of ideas and technology through industry groups, trade publications, and organizations across the border kept Canadians informed about developments in drilling technology, the relatively modest size and scale of their operations prompted the nascent Canadian industry to rely companies and services based out of the United States. Nevertheless, experience gained during these early years produced a cadre of well-trained and skilled Canadian oilmen, capable of holding their own against American crews, by the 1930s. Beyond the fact that it [End Page 652] was the single largest indigenous source of petroleum in the Commonwealth through the Second World War, the real significance of the Turner Valley oil and gas patch might be that it provided Canadians with the opportunity to acquire valuable skills in a technologically driven industry. The evolution from cable tool to rotary rig transformed the production of oil and gas from an erratic endeavour requiring more luck than skill into an increasingly professional and specialized industry. After the first rotary rig was introduced into Alberta in 1914, the transition from cable tool began in earnest in the 1920s and was complete by 1939, with the exception of a handful of wildcatters who continued to use the cheaper system. As Canadians gained experience in the oil fields of western Canada, a series of incremental improvements to the rotary rig system – the transition from rigs employing steam power to the internal combustion engine, for example – improved performance. Canadians played a part in this evolution, particularly in the 'modern era' of the Alberta industry in the decades following the Leduc discovery in 1947, with the development of rig bits. Gow notes that their contributions 'slowed the one-way flow of American drilling technology' and reversed it in some instances (338). Gow's detailed account is the product of five years of research on the subject and makes ample use of the available archival sources, interviews, and secondary literature. The coverage of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score1.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→